Contemporary Issue Position Essay

Issue Identification and Position

The case involves the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), which are mechanical circulatory support gadgets used for end-stage heart failure. The case relates to the ethics of life support and the right of the patient to refuse the treatment regardless of the risk involved, including death. RM is a 71-year-old man who was treated using the LVAD through his spouse’s consent but declined the therapy when he regained his ability to make decisions (Allen, 2019). My ethical position in the case supports the respect for the patient’s autonomy and informed consent. The patient has the right to refuse the treatment that lengthens his life but faces other risks, such as infection, bleeding, and other complications.

The implication of the Issue for an NP

As a nurse practitioner, I will have a responsibility to work directly with patients, examining them, prescribing medications, diagnosing illnesses, and providing treatment. Therefore, the outcome of the case involving the use of LVADs will affect my work directly. I have to make an important decision as to whether to respect the patient’s wish to discontinue the treatment or continue with it to protect life. It is a major ethical dilemma for nurse practitioners who are torn between the need to preserve life and to respect the right of a competent patient to refuse treatment.

Legal, Ethical, and Professional Evidence

Regardless of the commitment and the need to protect life by providing effective treatment, I have to respect the patient’s autonomy and the right to refuse treatment. The right to refuse treatment is entrenched in the law under the decision, such as Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health. The Patient Self-Determination Act is another legal code that protects the right of the patient to accept or refuse treatment (Allen, 2019). Ethically, the patient has the right to make an independent decision under the ethical principle of autonomy. From legal and ethical standpoints, health care professionals cannot coerce or force patients to agree with their points of view regarding their care and treatment.

Strategies and Solutions for Addressing the Issue

The issue can be addressed through communication strategies by convincing the patient to agree to the treatment. Since the healthcare professionals have no legal or ethical authority to force the patient to accept the procedure, they can try to persuade him about the importance of LVAD use to prolong life (Allen, 2019). The health care provider will try to convince the patient that the treatment benefits outweigh the risks. Besides, the doctor will monitor the treatment modality to control the adverse effects. Relaying information to the patient is a critical role of healthcare providers, but they cannot force the patient to agree with their perspective.

Other Ethical Issues

Another ethical issue that emerges in the case entails whether the doctor has the responsibility of offering the most effective care to the patient. In this case, the doctor believes that the use of LVAD is necessary to prolong the patient’s life. Failure to provide the treatment is the same as allowing the patient to die, and the doctor may feel responsible for the imminent death. Nonmaleficence, the principle that requires doctors to avoid “doing harm,” applies to the situation. The doctor may feel that he or she is harming the patient by refusing to offer the necessary treatment that would save or prolong his life.

How do you place an order?

It takes a few steps to place an order with Us:

  • The first step is to place your order. You will need to provide us with some basic information about your project.
  • Once you have placed your order, you will be taken to our secure payment page.
  • Once we receive your order, we will carefully review it and match you with a writer who has the skills and experience.
  • Stay in contact with the writer and discuss vital details of research.
  • Your completed proposal will be delivered via email within the specified deadline.

You are secure when using our service

It's critical for each client to feel secure. As a result, we at Research Proposal Writing take precautions to secure your data.

Financial security You may securely pay for your purchase using a variety of secure payment methods.
Personal security The personal information of our clients is secure. Nobody else will have access to it.
Academic security We use a specialized program to check every completed paper to ensure that we deliver no-plagiarism samples.
Web security This website is safe from unauthorized breaches. We maintain our privacy management in line with the latest laws and regulations.

You can get help placing your order. If you have any questions about our services, please contact us. Our support staff is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

If you're still looking for a way to improve your grades and hire expert writers, we've got you covered. Place an order on our website, and we'll help you with any paperwork you want. We will exceed your expectations.

Order now Get a quote